Comparative Study of Different Predictive Values of Risk Scores for Predicting Contrast Induced Nephropathy and Short Outcome after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-Juniper Publishers
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiG70iNzVE9rTWlh3le6q1GMa1CzpFeqobCmDo84bnffHOO8rlk0kyOjB7GRw8sj_W4yGOF3eY9n4EEoNTa8Ql_pQwVyynKP3FJAqgKpgP_iPQPTm-8CXzhdMdt8FWz_UvcFgY3ldF1nLw/w324-h400/Juniper+Publishers_Journal+of+Cardiology+%2526+Cardiovascular+Therapy.jpg)
JUNIPER PUBLISHERS - OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY & CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY Abstract Background: Meticulous risk stratification for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is important for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Aim of the work: To compare between different risk scores for predicting contrast induced nephropathy and short outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Material and methods: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients who presented with STEMI and treated with Primary PCI (PPCI). Mehran, Gao, Chen, ACEF or AGEF (age, serum creatinine, or glomerular filtration rate, and ejection fraction); and GRACE (Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events) risk scores were calculated for each patient. The predictive accuracy of the 6 scores for CIN, in-hospital death and major adverse clinical events ...